Age, Biography and Wiki
Elizabeth Spelke was born on 28 May, 1949. Discover Elizabeth Spelke’s Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is She in this year and how She spends money? Also learn how She earned most of networth at the age of 74 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
N/A |
| Age |
74 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Gemini |
| Born |
28 May, 1949 |
| Birthday |
28 May |
| Birthplace |
N/A |
| Nationality |
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 28 May.
She is a member of famous with the age 74 years old group.
Elizabeth Spelke Height, Weight & Measurements
At 74 years old, Elizabeth Spelke height not available right now. We will update Elizabeth Spelke’s Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don’t have much information about She’s past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Husband |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Elizabeth Spelke Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Elizabeth Spelke worth at the age of 74 years old? Elizabeth Spelke’s income source is mostly from being a successful . She is from . We have estimated
Elizabeth Spelke’s net worth
, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2023 |
$1 Million – $5 Million |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2022 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2022 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
|
Elizabeth Spelke Social Network
| Instagram |
|
| Linkedin |
|
| Twitter |
|
| Facebook |
|
| Wikipedia |
|
| Imdb |
|
Timeline
In 2005, Lawrence Summers, then Harvard president, speculated over the preponderance of men over women in high-end science and engineering positions. He surmised that a statistical difference in the variance of innate abilities among male and female populations (male variance tends to be higher, resulting in more extremes) could play a role. His words immediately sparked a heated debate. Spelke was among the strongest critics of Summers, and in April 2005, she faced Steven Pinker in an open debate over the issue. She declared that her own experiments revealed no difference between the mental capacities of male and female children ranging in age from 5 months to 7 years old.
Her first academic post was at the University of Pennsylvania, where she worked for nine years. Thereafter she moved first to Cornell, and then to MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. She has been a professor at Harvard since 2001.
Spelke was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1997. She was the recipient of the 2009 Jean Nicod Prize and delivered a series of lectures in Paris hosted by the French National Centre for Scientific Research. She was elected as a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy in 2015. In 2016 Spelke won the C.L. de Carvalho-Heineken Prize for Cognitive Sciences.
Starting in the 1980s, she carried out experiments on infants and young children to test their cognitive faculties. She has suggested that human beings have a large array of innate mental abilities. In recent years, she has made important contributions to the debate on cognitive differences between men and women. She defends the position that there is no scientific evidence of any significant disparity in the intellectual faculties of males and females.
Elizabeth Shilin Spelke FBA (born May 28, 1949) is an American cognitive psychologist at the Department of Psychology of Harvard University and director of the Laboratory for Developmental Studies.
Through an array of similar experiments, Spelke interpreted her evidence to suggest that babies have a set of highly sophisticated, innate mental skills. This provides an alternative to the hypothesis originated by William James that babies are born with no distinctive cognitive abilities but acquire them all through education and experience (see Principles of Psychology, 1890).