“Devastating” reports of forced marriage to the national helpline have surged as experts warn the issue remains “rife” but it is difficult to see the true scale of the problem due to people not coming forward.
Exclusive data from Karma Nirvana, which supports forced marriage victims, shows its helpline dealt with 42 per cent more cases between April 2022 and March 2023 than they did in the same period two years before – up from 380 cases in 2020-21 to 536 this year.
This means cases are back to pre-pandemic levels, when they handled 533 cases between April 2019 and March 2020.
Natasha Rattu, director of Karma Nirvana, told The Independent a dip during the pandemic was because curbs on social gatherings and travel restrictions meant arranging forced marriage was harder.
Her comments come as a new study found the number of people coming forward to alert authorities to forced marriage plummeted during the pandemic.
First-of-its-kind research, by the University of Lincoln and the University of Bristol, discovered queries to the government’s forced marriage unit sharply declined from 1,507 inquiries in 2018 to 337 in 2021.
Experts agreed the “alarming” fall was likely to have been caused by Covid rule temporarily curbing forced marriages but added victims, relatives, lawyers, teachers, social workers and others were also less likely to be able to report to the forced marriage unit during lockdowns.
The report, which examined civil injunctions intended to stop forced marriages issued by the family courts called Forced Marriage Protection Orders, found around 250 have been approved each year during the past ten years. This constitutes roughly five orders each week – with researchers warning forced marriage continues to be “rife” in England and Wales.
Aisha K Gill, who co-authored the report, told The Independent the “steady use of” Forced Marriage Protection Orders demonstrates forced marriage has not gone away and warned it’s not an issue which can be eliminated “overnight”.
Dr Gill, professor of Criminology at the University of Bristol, argued the pandemic “exposed and exacerbated pre-existing weaknesses in our public support systems” and “drove the issue of forced marriage even deeper underground”.
Forced marriage is defined as incidents where one party or both do not agree to the marriage or are not in a position to consent, and it routinely results in rape.
Dr Gill noted “under-reporting” of forced marriage continues to be a major problem. “Far from being on the decline, we are just dealing with the tip of the iceberg,” she added.
The academic explained perpetrators are generally parents or relatives as she noted the practice inflicts “significant damage” and constitutes not just a “human rights violation” but also child abuse.
“The coercive element is devastating for these victims,” Dr Gill said. “We must address this problem and link this with control and abuse and control of sexuality.”
Dr Gill noted the findings demonstrate for the first time how Forced Marriage Protection Orders are a “double-edged sword” as while “they can prevent forced marriage and protect victims, these orders can also increase the risk of honour-based violence, including abduction, physical assaults, kidnapping and rape”.
There is a “gendered element” to forced marriage, with the overwhelming majority of cases they looked at involving a woman victims.
Sundari Anitha, who was also involved in the report, noted Forced Marriage Protection Orders differ to other injunctions for domestic abuse in which the victim will have fled their abuser and the order will bar contact.
The professor of gender, violence, and work at the University of Lincoln explained with Forced Marriage Protection Orders “most people who seek them continue to live in their family home or remain in touch with the perpetrators, their parents”.
She added: “These young people are trying to balance their need to protect themselves from a forced marriage while avoiding a complete family estrangement.”
Professor Anitha said “if orders are treated as an end in themselves, it can expose victims to further serious harm”.
The study, conducted in conjunction with the Nuffield Foundation, found the most common age bracket for forced marriage victims was 16 to 21 but sometimes victims were just 11-years-old.
Researchers, whose findings were presented to MPs this week, noted widely held assumptions forced marriage only takes place in South Asian or Middle Eastern diaspora communities are incorrect, instead finding forced marriage also happens in Nigerian, Irish, Somali communities, as well as others.
Diana Nammi, executive director of Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation (IKWRO), a British charity which helps victims of honour-based abuse and forced marriage, told The Independent: “Forced marriage is a deep-rooted problem which don’t disappear from one day to the next. We have dealt with lots of forced marriage cases in the UK since the pandemic.”
Legislation which made it illegal to force someone into marriage in England and Wales was introduced in 2014 and anyone found guilty of doing so can be imprisoned for up to seven years.
While new legislation banning child marriage came into force in England and Wales earlier this year, meaning the legal age of marriage has been raised to 18. The new law means any actions taken to make a child get married constitutes forced marriage.